The remainder of Part One of Drive by Daniel Pink focuses on the effectiveness of "carrots and sticks" with regard to accomplishment.  (For my thoughts on the opening of Part One, click here)  He  focuses primarily on the business world, but there are obvious  implications for those of us in education, as we are, perhaps, the  ultimate home of "carrot and stick" thinking.
This past spring, I was part of my school's New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC) re-accreditation team at  a planning conference.  At one point, the discussion shifted to how  precise a student's GPA really is, even out to three decimal places,  meaning given the various teachers and the combinations therein that two  students could have had, are we really sure that one student is  potentially .001 of a point different than another?  And what have those  students learned?  Can we truly quantify knowledge?  As someone on  Twitter suggested this week (sorry, I can't remember who said it), it is  impossible to figure out what a person "knows." 
Given  that, shouldn't we try to inspire students simply to love learning?   Should we wonder if the students who finish at "top" of their class are  just really good at playing school, but haven't really learned  anything?  Should we be concerned that students are far more concerned  about the grades they have "earned" than whether or not they have  actually learned anything?  Evidence would suggest that the "carrot" of  earning an A and graduating from high school just isn't enough for  students who drop out or never graduate.  The "stick" of not earning  that high school diploma  does not seem to deter thousands of teenagers  from walking away from high school every year.  
Shouldn't  we be shifting the discussion away from "carrots and sticks" and  towards a demonstration of actual learning?  Watching one of my students  from two school years ago now bounce into my room because the video  that she CREATED about Dred Scott had received almost 2,700 views was  worth all of the fits and starts of bringing technology into my room.   She said two things to me that day that will drive me forward and  continue to have students create things: first, that she "may have  taught someone about Dred Scott," and second, that maybe she would make  documentaries.  Whether that second part ever happens, I may never know,  but the sheer excitement on her face was worth whatever people might  say about what happens in a high school classroom.
Shouldn't the joy of figuring something out after starting with nothing should be the reward in itself? 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment